FunderPro Consistency: Pro 45%, One-Phase 40% & Classic
Compare FunderPro Pro’s 45%, One-Phase’s 40% and Classic’s exemption. Understand equity-based tracking and why Instant needs separate terms.
The percentage depends on the challenge and stage
FunderPro’s official consistency table lists Pro at 45% in phases one and two, One-Phase at 40% in its single phase, and Classic without a consistency rule in either phase. It then states funded stages have no consistency rule in the context of these challenges. One company-wide percentage is therefore misleading. Check the full product name on your invoice: a separate product such as Instant requires separate terms, and the challenge table does not establish its exemption.
The comparison to make before purchase
- Pro Phase 1: the highest-profit day must not exceed 45% of total profit under the company’s accounting.
- Pro Phase 2: the same published 45% threshold.
- One-Phase: 40%.
- Classic Phases 1 and 2: no consistency rule in the official table.
- Funded stages of these challenges: the page states no consistency rule.
- Instant or another version: consult its own product terms rather than extending this table.
Understand the percentages with examples
An educational concentration example: a $900 best day against $2,000 accepted total profit is 45%. That equals the published Pro limit but exceeds One-Phase’s 40%. An $800 best day against $2,000 is 40%. The source says must not exceed, but the company report and profit definition govern practical eligibility. Retain a margin rather than relying on exact equality or rounding at the boundary.
Open profit is part of the measurement
The critical detail is that the official rule is equity-based and calculated using unrealised rather than only realised profit: open positions enter the measurement. A ratio built solely from closed trades may therefore differ from the dashboard. The page also says the highest-profit day still counts when the account is in loss. It does not establish every detail of intraday peak recording or daily reset timing; ask support about those details when reconciling your report.
Why hitting the target may not complete the challenge
Reaching the profit objective does not remove profit-distribution requirements in a challenge carrying consistency. Your account can exceed its target while one day represents too much of total profit, leaving progression requirements incomplete. The source describes ineligibility, not a universal rule that every temporary excess instantly terminates an account. Do not deliberately lose money or increase risk to force a ratio; review dashboard readings and completion conditions first.
Classic does not waive other restrictions
No Classic consistency rule means this specific requirement is absent in the two listed phases. Profit targets, daily and overall loss limits, permitted strategies and other account conditions remain separate. Similarly, no consistency requirement after these challenges does not establish instant withdrawals or an exemption from identity checks or payout minimums. This guide does not add an unverified payout amount or schedule; it explains consistency rather than substituting for a payment policy.
Choose around your actual profit pattern
If most strategy profit comes from one session, compare the effect of 40% and 45% with Classic, but do not select a plan on consistency alone. Review final price, drawdown, holding restrictions, platforms and residence eligibility in current company and official terms. Record the program, stage, trading-day definition and treatment of open profit. A consistency calculator explains the arithmetic; it does not automatically reproduce FunderPro’s equity-history accounting.
Useful links
- Current FunderPro plans
- Calculate a consistency percentage
- The Consistency Rule Explained: How to Calculate It Before Your Payout
- AquaFunded Consistency Rules by Plan: 15%, 20%, 25%, 50%
- Prop Firm Drawdown Explained: Daily, Overall, Static and Trailing